Epic Games CEO testifies in trial, saying Google is a 'crooked' and bullying company.

Epic Games, the creator of Fortnite, stands against Google in a court case challenging alleged monopolistic practices. Epic sees Google as a 'crooked bully' interfering with fair competition.

The Epic Games versus Google court case is an unfolding drama that mirrors a similar legal battle between Epic and Apple. At the core of the dispute is the control exerted by these tech leviathans on software distribution via their platforms.

Tim Sweeney, the Chief Executive Officer of Epic Games, offered a testimony characterising Google as a 'crooked bully.' He accuses Google of allegedly flexing its market dominance to maintain control over the Play Store and, by extension, Android users.

Microsoft wants to know why you won't switch to Edge after downloading Chrome from it.
Related Article

Sweeney began with acknowledging the remarkable innovations by Google. He appreciated their contribution in 'grokking' the internet's chaos, but quickly moved to the real issue of the trial.

Epic Games CEO testifies in trial, saying Google is a

His main gripe was against the rigid stipulations by Google that mandate all apps distributed through Play Store need to use their payment system. This policy, he claims, cuts into the revenues of app developers.

Attempting to sidestep the mandated system, Epic Games offered Fortnite, its flagship product, as a direct download on the Epic Games website. They also made it available on the Samsung Galaxy App Store.

Google, however, allegedly pressured phone manufacturers to prevent preloads of the Epic Games app.

The trial against Google doesn’t only revolve around distribution and revenue but also brings attention to the policies that control the vast Android ecosystem.

Android's open system allows for the installation of apps outside the Play Store, unlike the closed-loop ecosystem of Apple. Nonetheless, Sweeney argues that Google ingeniously creates hurdles that deter such activities.

Okta loses over $2 billion in market value due to a major cybersecurity breach.
Related Article

Google introduced Play Protect, a security measure that screens all apps installed on Android, shortly after Epic Games released Fortnite outside the Play Store.

Sweeney testified that this was a strategic move from Google to deter sideloading through warning messages about potential security risks.

Even with the Play Protect hurdles, Fortnite saw considerable success outside the Play Store with over 50 million downloads via these workarounds.

Despite this, Fortnite was finally launched on the Google Play Store in April 2020, reasoning that the obstacles placed by Google to sideloading were just too onerous.

This decision churned customer dissatisfaction as it meant customers had to pay higher prices. The additional costs were due to the 30% commission to be given to Google for transactions done on the Play Store.

This trial with Google is reminiscent of the legal fight Epic Games had with Apple which centered on the same issue of maintaining a level playing field in the app distribution market.

Epic Games initiated a premeditated rebellion last August by introducing an in-app payment system in Fortnite to bypass the commission fee. This move led to Fortnite getting booted off both the App Store and Play Store.

This caused the Fortnite’s user base to drop significantly in both platforms, leading to the initiation of the lengthy legal battles against both Apple and Google that Epic Games is currently embroiled in.

The verdict of the Google-Epic battle is eagerly awaited by the tech world. A win for Epic Games could potentially alter the dynamics of the Android marketplace and could pose significant ramifications for other app developers and large tech companies.

It's worth mentioning that the proceedings of this trial are scrutinized by thousands as they will create the precedents that will determine future legal battles of this nature.

The trail, which began on Monday, is a jury-less trial presided by Judge James Donato. There is no specific timeline as to when a judgement can be expected.

Epic Games is not only seeking financial damages, but also an injunction to restrict Google's control over in-app payments, which would force a significant change in the business model of any app store.

This case indeed has widespread potential and could extend far beyond the Android platform. A shake-up in Android's software distribution model could ripple out to other platforms. This makes it a significant spectacle not only for Google and Epic, but also for the entire digital industry.

One thing is certain: with this lawsuit, Epic Games is challenging the status quo and pushing for a monumental shift in how the app economy works.

This lawsuit is a David versus Goliath battle, pitting a game developer against a tech giant. And just like the biblical story, this confrontation has the potential to shift the balance of power.

Regardless of the outcome, this trial will indubitably go down in history as a significant event in the timeline of the digital industry, setting the tone for future negotiations and litigation for years to come.

Categories