Examining the Contradiction
The idea of an unholy alliance refers to a contradiction of sorts. It focuses particularly on the Evangelicals' support of Donald Trump. It is odd, to say the least, because Trump does not embody the Christian values that Evangelicals supposedly cherish. He is not notably religious, nor does he lead a life based on humility, charity or forgiveness.
However, this discrepancy only seems strange until you consider that being religious or portraying Christian virtues is not necessarily the main requirement for Evangelicals to support someone. Perhaps the real reason lies elsewhere—the political and ideological benefits their support might reap. In this sense, the unholy alliance seems less unusual.
The Evangelicals' Support
In American politics, Evangelical Christians often play a significant role. They are known to be fervent supporters of conservative politics, and this support goes beyond merely the political realm. Indeed, the Evangelicals' advocacy for Trump might be due to his conservative positioning more than his religious standing.
And quite interestingly, their support for Trump seems undeterred by his lack of Christian virtue. They persistently defend him, justifying their backing on the grounds that he fights for their causes. To them, this tenacity makes up for his lack of religiosity.
This unholy alliance strengthens the notion that religion and politics are intrinsically linked, each influencing the other in sometimes surprising ways. In the case of this relationship, it is a robust reinforcing cycle—one that does more to blur than to clarify.
Fighting the Culture Wars
At the core of this alliance is a fierce culture war that the Evangelicals fear losing. They view Trump as their weapon in this war. For Evangelicals, his administrations' policies, including appointing conservative judges, opposing abortion rights, and defending religious freedoms, align quite well with their interest.
But this seems contradictory, given Trump's personal indiscretions and behaviors. However, the Evangelicals are willing to overlook these as long as the fight in the culture wars is effectively won.
Trump's appeal to these Christian conservatives lies in his willingness to combat public opinion and uphold their traditionalist stances. He gives their concerns a voice—an influential platform in the highest office of the land.
The Conservative Agenda
The Evangelicals' support for Trump boils down to the alignment of their conservative ideologies. It is clear that their backing is less about Trump's religious adherence and more about the policies he stands for. Trump's conservative agenda conforms to the Evangelicals’ political and ideological preferences, justifying their continued backing despite his conduct.
And while this might seem contradictory, it is essential to remember that alliances are not always made on shared virtues or morals. More often, they form through shared goals, interests, and perceived benefits.
In this way, the Evangelical's alliance with Trump comes into context. They align themselves with him not because of shared Christian virtues, but because of shared political ideologies and objectives. They see in him a leader who can further their conservative agenda and protect their interests.
Victims or Victors?
There is an interesting dynamic at play in the Evangelicals' endorsement of Trump. They tend to see themselves as victims in a society increasingly detached from conservative Christian values. Yet, in this victimization narrative, they also find their power. With Trump as their champion, they position themselves as victors rather than victims.
Trump's presidency has thus brought about a significant shift in their self-perception and public image. And while this might not match with their projected Christian values, it offers a win in the culture wars they are deeply invested in. This, perhaps, is their primary motivation to continue endorsing Trump.
This unholy alliance between Evangelicals and Trump offers a unique insight into the intricate relationship between religious powers and political realms. It blurs the line between the sacred and the profane, challenging the conventional understanding of alliances and conflicts within American politics.